<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Diets in Review Blog &#187; no pudge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/tag/no-pudge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column</link>
	<description>Diet Column - bringing you all the best diet news and opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Food Fight: Brownies</title>
		<link>http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/07/food-fight-brownies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/07/food-fight-brownies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition & Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betty crocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brownies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy snacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no pudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/07/food-fight-brownies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Stepping into our Food Fight ring this week are two rich, fudgy and decadent contenders- No Pudge Original Fat Free Fudge Brownie and Betty Crocker Low-Fat Fudge Brownie. Are brownies a health food? No! Do you need to indulge occasionally? Yes! And when you do, shouldn&#8217;t you do it responsibly? Yes!
 
Fighter Notes
Betty Crocker is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="food fight" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/food-fight.jpg" alt="food fight" width="396" height="108" align="absmiddle" /></p>
<p>Stepping into our <a title="food fight" href="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/category/food-fight/"  target="_blank">Food Fight</a> ring this week are two rich, fudgy and decadent contenders- No Pudge Original Fat Free Fudge Brownie and Betty Crocker Low-Fat Fudge Brownie. Are brownies a health food? No! Do you need to indulge occasionally? Yes! And when you do, shouldn&#8217;t you do it responsibly? Yes!</p>
<p><img title="no pudge brownies" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/no-pudge-logo.gif" alt="no pudge brownies" width="125" height="123" align="absmiddle" /> <img title="betty crocker" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/betty-crocker-logo.gif" alt="betty crocker" width="150" height="59" align="absmiddle" /></p>
<p><strong>Fighter Notes</strong><br />
Betty Crocker is of course the beloved baked-goods-at-home-made-easy brand. It was the only brand at the grocery store that offered a low-fat variety, making it my only choice for competition against No Pudge. They do not mention this product on their Web site.</p>
<p>No Pudge has been taking the fat out of this dreamy dessert since the 90s.<span id="more-831"></span></p>
<p><strong><img title=" no pudge brownies" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/no-pudge-fat-free-brownies.jpg" alt=" no pudge brownies" width="148" height="250" align="left" />Round 1: Nutrition Facts</strong></p>
<p>Serving size, as printed on the package, is a 32g serving of cooked brownie (1/12 of package for No Pudge, 1/18 of package for Betty Crocker). Nutrition Facts are for prepared mix.</p>
<p>Calories: NP = 120, BC = 140<br />
Fat: NP = 0g, BC = 3g<br />
Sat Fat: NP = 0g, BC = .5g<br />
Trans Fat: NP = 0g, BC = .5g<br />
Cholesterol: NP = 0mg, BC = 10mg<br />
Dietary Fiber: NP = 1g, BC = 1g<br />
Sugars: NP = 24, BC = 20<br />
Protein: NP = 3g, BC = 2g</p>
<p>Obvious kudos go to No Pudge for being fat free, having no saturated or trans fats, zero cholesterol and more protein. That&#8217;s an impressive lead that gives Round 1 to No Pudge.</p>
<p><strong>Round 2: Taste and Ingredients</strong></p>
<p><img title="betty crocker brownies" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/betty-crocker-brownies.jpg" alt="betty crocker brownies" width="227" height="250" align="left" />If you served these side by side with no explanation of which is which- no one would recognize that one is fat free- or that one is lower in fat. Both No Pudge and Betty Crocker get points for having a moist, rich, fudgy and truly cravable brownie without a lot of the extra fat and calories. No Pudge has a richer chocolate color and is not as overwhelmingly sweet as Betty Crocker- which has a classic chocolate brown color and a lot of sugary taste.</p>
<p>I give them some credit for having the only low-fat brownie mix on the shelf. An A for effort.</p>
<p>We would call this round a tie- except that Betty Crocker&#8217;s ingredients leave a lot to be desired. Enriched flours, processed cocoa, partially hydrogenated oils (the trans fat source), artificial flavors and a lot of other stuff. To make the batter, you add an egg, vegetable oil and water. The No Pudge has only all natural ingredients- a simple list including pure cane sugar, unbleached wheat flour, dutch cocoa and egg whites. To make this batter, you only had no-fat vanilla yogurt.</p>
<p>No Pudge comes in other Fat Free flavors like Cappuccino, Raspberry and Mint.</p>
<p>No Pudge clearly wins this round.</p>
<p><strong>Round Three: Cost and Accessibility</strong></p>
<p>Betty Crocker is available nationwide in probably every grocer you can imagine. This one pound box was $2.69. It&#8217;s also available in a case of 12 from <a title="betty crocker low-fat brownies" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000S85LDK/ref=nosim/?tag=wwweasyfreesc-20" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');" target="_blank">Amazon</a> for $21.60. There is no mention of this product on its brand Web site.</p>
<p>No Pudge is also available nationwide in most every grocer as well. They have a store finder on their site. This 13.7oz. box was $3.69. It&#8217;s available for sale on their Web site for $3.35 (a case of 6 is $18). No Pudge is also available on <a title="no pudge brownies" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000GZYAN2/ref=nosim/?tag=wwweasyfreesc-20" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.amazon.com');" target="_blank">Amazon</a>, a 6 pack is $17.91.</p>
<p>No Pudge claims round three as well.</p>
<p><strong><img title="no pudge brownies" src="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/no-pudge-brownies.gif" alt="no pudge brownies" width="250" height="195" align="right" />Post-Match Commentary</strong><br />
A clear winner from the first turn of the mixer, No Pudge Brownies are an ideal alternative to the traditional fat-filled brownies, for anyone craving those chewy, gooey treats while still trying to maintain healthy eating habits. Betty Crocker gave a valiant effort, but at the end of the day, the fat content, poor ingredients, trans-fat and low access will leave it resting on the shelf.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column" >Diets in Review Blog</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/07/food-fight-brownies/" >Food Fight: Brownies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dietsinreview.com/diet_column/07/food-fight-brownies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
