Popular topics:
Diet News, Diet Reviews, Diet Shows, Diet Tips, Diets in Review, General

Archive for the 'Food Fight' Category

1

Food Fight: Vitamin Waters

Welcome to Diets in Review! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

food fight

During the past couple of years, vitamin and nutrition waters have broken on to the health food scene as the must-have beverage. Why wouldn’t you want to quench your thirst, hydrate your body and get a dose of vitamins at the same time? Unfortunately, each of those bottles comes packed with calories. If you’re like most people, you’ll drink the entire bottle in one sitting- meaning you’ve nearly tripled the calories, sugar and sodium you’re ingesting.

In today’s Food Fight, we take a look at three popular brands- Aquafina Alive by Pepsi, Dasani Plus by Coke and SoBe Life Water by South Beach Beverage Co.

Fighter Notes
Each of these 20 oz. bottles advertises its vitamin content right on the front, as well as calories. We’re not too sure about bottled water that requires a calorie count. They each also note that they have natural flavors.

ROUND ONE: Nutrition Facts

dasani plus vitamin waterEach of these vitamin waters’ nutrition label shows an 8 fl. oz. serving size, with 2.5 servings per container. How many of you drink 8 oz. out of a water bottle and then save the rest for later? So the nutrition facts I’m about to share, you can probably go ahead and multiply by 2.5 to find out what you’re really consuming. One side note- regular bottles of water do not have serving sizes or calories or grams of sugar.

Life Water / Dasani Plus / Aquafina Alive
Calories: 40 / 0 / 0
Fat: 0 / 0 / 0
Sodium: 35mg / 25mg / 65mg
Total Carbs: 10g / 1g / 0g
Sugar: 10g / — / 0
Fiber: — / 1g / –
WW Points: .8 / -.2 / 0

As these are vitamin waters, here is the breakdown in vitamin content per serving with percent of daily value:
Vitamin C: 100% / — / 10%
Vitamin E: 20% / 10% / 10%
Niacin: 10% / 10% / –
Vitamin B6: 10% / 10% / –
Vitamin B12: 10% / 10% / –

Round 1 is going to Dasani Plus as it has zero calories, the lowest sodium of these waters and a gram of fiber.

(– indicates no values on label)

ROUND TWO: Taste and Ingredients

I was able to find Dasani Plus and Aquafina Alive in similar flavors: Dasani’s Pomegranate Blackberry and Aquafina’s Berry Pomegranate. From SoBe’s Life Water I chose Strawberry Kiwi.

Dasani Plus smelled like a popsicle when I opened it, like a popular kids’ sugary punch. The flavor seemed kind of flat. I didn’t really pick up anything too pomegranate or blackberry. The carbonation was about the only thing exciting in the taste. The first three ingredients include filtered water, maltodextrin (a common food additive used as a sweetener made from wheat) and natural flavors. It also contains a very long list of hard to pronounce ingredients and artificial colorings.

aquafina alive vitamin waterAquafina Alive was very subtle in smell and taste. The flavor is OK, and I can definitely taste the berries in this one. This water is not carbonated. The first three ingredients for Aquafina Alive include filtered water, natural flavors and phosphoric acid (a mineral acid used in food to give it a tangy taste; naturally this can be achieved by using ginger or natural citric acids). Splenda is used as a sweetener and it has a few other hard to pronounce ingredients. It’s concerning that on the Aquafina Alive Web site the ingredients list includes caffeine as the eighth ingredient- but that is missing from the printed label on the bottle.

sobe life waterSoBe Life Water had a very light flavor that I enjoyed, and just a little sweet. It does not have any strong scent and it is not carbonated. The first three ingredients are filtered water, sugar and natural flavors. SoBe includes vegetable juice concentrate for color. There are also the herbal ingredients lemon balm extract and chamomile extract- giving this bottled water an herbal edge over its vitamin competitors.

I give round two to SoBe for having the most palatable flavor and the least offensive ingredients. Someone had to win, but I wasn’t terribly impressed with any of them. It just left me wanting a glass of regular old water.

ROUND THREE: Cost and Accessibility

Aquafina Alive, Dasani Plus and SoBe Life Water are each national brands. You are likely to find this in just about any grocery or convenient store you walk into. None of these waters were found to be available online.

At my grocer, a national chain, Dasani Plus was $1.39, Aquafina Alive was $1.39 and SoBe Life Water was $1.59.

Dasani Plus and Aquafina tie round three.

dasani plus vitamin waterPost-Match Commentary
Dasani Plus manages to barely win this DietsInReview.com Food Fight. Water is so important to the health and vitality of your body- it seems you’d gain more by just drinking water. I don’t ever remember a time I had to look at a nutrition label before drinking a glass of water. If it’s vitamins you’re after- try having a piece of fruit or some vegetables. You’ll likely get more out of a serving of that. Vitamin and nutrition waters is a cash-cow of a trend that the beverage companies are riding all the way to the bank.

Other popular brands in this category that still don’t quite stack up are Propel Fitness water with 10 calories and 2g sugar and Glaceau Vitamin Water with 50 calories and 13g sugar. Make sure you’re reading those nutrition labels!



1

Food Fight: Brownies

food fight

Stepping into our Food Fight ring this week are two rich, fudgy and decadent contenders- No Pudge Original Fat Free Fudge Brownie and Betty Crocker Low-Fat Fudge Brownie. Are brownies a health food? No! Do you need to indulge occasionally? Yes! And when you do, shouldn’t you do it responsibly? Yes!

no pudge brownies     betty crocker

Fighter Notes
Betty Crocker is of course the beloved baked-goods-at-home-made-easy brand. It was the only brand at the grocery store that offered a low-fat variety, making it my only choice for competition against No Pudge. They do not mention this product on their Web site.

No Pudge has been taking the fat out of this dreamy dessert since the 90s.

 no pudge browniesRound 1: Nutrition Facts

Serving size, as printed on the package, is a 32g serving of cooked brownie (1/12 of package for No Pudge, 1/18 of package for Betty Crocker). Nutrition Facts are for prepared mix.

Calories: NP = 120, BC = 140
Fat: NP = 0g, BC = 3g
Sat Fat: NP = 0g, BC = .5g
Trans Fat: NP = 0g, BC = .5g
Cholesterol: NP = 0mg, BC = 10mg
Dietary Fiber: NP = 1g, BC = 1g
Sugars: NP = 24, BC = 20
Protein: NP = 3g, BC = 2g
WW Points: NP = 2, BC = 3

Obvious kudos go to No Pudge for being fat free, having no saturated or trans fats, zero cholesterol and more protein. That’s an impressive lead that gives Round 1 to No Pudge.

Round 2: Taste and Ingredients

betty crocker browniesIf you served these side by side with no explanation of which is which- no one would recognize that one is fat free- or that one is lower in fat. Both No Pudge and Betty Crocker get points for having a moist, rich, fudgy and truly cravable brownie without a lot of the extra fat and calories. No Pudge has a richer chocolate color and is not as overwhelmingly sweet as Betty Crocker- which has a classic chocolate brown color and a lot of sugary taste.

I give them some credit for having the only low-fat brownie mix on the shelf. An A for effort.

We would call this round a tie- except that Betty Crocker’s ingredients leave a lot to be desired. Enriched flours, processed cocoa, partially hydrogenated oils (the trans fat source), artificial flavors and a lot of other stuff. To make the batter, you add an egg, vegetable oil and water. The No Pudge has only all natural ingredients- a simple list including pure cane sugar, unbleached wheat flour, dutch cocoa and egg whites. To make this batter, you only had no-fat vanilla yogurt.

No Pudge comes in other Fat Free flavors like Cappuccino, Raspberry and Mint.

No Pudge clearly wins this round.

Round Three: Cost and Accessibility

Betty Crocker is available nationwide in probably every grocer you can imagine. This one pound box was $2.69. It’s also available in a case of 12 from Amazon for $21.60. There is no mention of this product on its brand Web site.

No Pudge is also available nationwide in most every grocer as well. They have a store finder on their site. This 13.7oz. box was $3.69. It’s available for sale on their Web site for $3.35 (a case of 6 is $18). No Pudge is also available on Amazon, a 6 pack is $17.91.

No Pudge claims round three as well.

no pudge browniesPost-Match Commentary
A clear winner from the first turn of the mixer, No Pudge Brownies are an ideal alternative to the traditional fat-filled brownies, for anyone craving those chewy, gooey treats while still trying to maintain healthy eating habits. Betty Crocker gave a valiant effort, but at the end of the day, the fat content, poor ingredients, trans-fat and low access will leave it resting on the shelf.



1

Food Fight: Ice Cream Sandwiches

food fight

In honor of National Ice Cream Month, this round of Food Fight has ice cream sandwiches putting on their boxing gloves. In one corner we have the Skinny Cow brand (by Dreyer’s) and in the other, Weight Watchers (by Blue Bunny).

skinny cow weight watchers logo

Fighter Notes
Skinny Cow is endorsed by Bob Greene’s Best Life Diet.
Weight Watchers is, of course, a product from the weight loss giant.
Both advertise on their packaging that they have low-fat ice cream, and both are produced by national brand ice cream dairies.

Round 1: Nutrition Facts

Serving size, printed on the packages, is one sandwich (71g for SC and 75g for WW).

Calories: SC = 140, WW = 140
Fat: SC = 1.5g, WW = 2g
Sat Fat: SC = 1g, WW = .5g
Cholesterol: SC = 1mg, WW = >5mg
Sodium: SC = 100mg, WW = 140mg
Carbs: SC = 30g, WW = 32g
Dietary Fiber: SC = 3g, WW = 4g
Sugar: SC = 15g, WW = 12g
Protein: SC = 4g, WW = 3g
WW Points: SC = 2, WW = 2 (both have the Weight Watchers Points printed on the package)

While both brands are noticeably low in calories, fat and only have 2 Weight Watchers Points, Skinny Cow leads the first round for having more attractive nutrition values than its competitor.

Round 2: Taste and Ingredients

Each of these ice cream sandwiches stand an inch tall, are packed with a soft-serve style ice cream between two chocolate wafers/cookies.

Skinny Cow has a subtly sweet flavor. The wafers are the good kind of chewy, moist and cake-like. The ice cream is sturdy, meaning it doesn’t melt too quickly and it’s pretty thick. The Weight Watchers sandwich was surprisingly bland- I couldn’t really taste anything. The wafers are dry and kind of crumble as you chew. The ice cream was too soft.

I was only able to find a package of Skinny Cow in the Chocolate/Vanilla 6-pack combo; they do offer five other flavors like Cookies ‘N Cream and Mint. I was able to find the Weight Watchers 6-pack of vanilla; they offer chocolate and vanilla only, in separate packages.

As for the ingredients- both were fairly similar. Skinny Cow used skim milk while Weight Watchers used milk fat and non-fat milk. Skinny Cow has high fructose corn syrup and Weight Watchers has partially hydrogenated oils; not a good play on either part- but at least one of them doesn’t have both of these ingredients.

Round two goes to Skinny Cow.

Round Three: Cost and Accessibility
Neither of these brands are available for purchase online. They are available nationwide in most national chain grocery stores. Skinny allows you to search by ZIP code, while Weight Watchers only shows an incomplete list of grocers (determined by mine, a major chain, not being listed). My grocer had Skinny Cow for $3.99 for the six pack, Weight Watchers for $4.69 for a six pack. This round goes to Skinny Cow.

skinny cowPost-Match Commentary
It’s a TKO that left the Weight Watchers ice cream sandwich out in the cold. While in all three rounds it was neck-to-neck, Skinny Cow stands out because of the superior flavor, offering broader selection, better nutritional values and for being slightly more affordable.



1

Food Fight: Pasta vs. Pasta

food fight

Ladies and gentleman, welcome to the very first DietsInReview.com Food Fight. You won’t get messy, but you will be a little more informed. Every two weeks (alternating with Food Finds), we’ll present a food match-up: two similar foods, both claiming to be the healthiest option, will go head-to-head in our nutritional ring to find out which prevails as the best. We’re looking at a three-round match: Nutrition Facts, Taste and Ingredients, Cost and Accessibility. So, let’s get started.

Our first Food Fight is between Fiber Gourmet Light Pasta (FG) and Barilla Plus (BP) pasta.

fiber gourmet pasta barilla pasta

FIGHTER NOTES
Fiber Gourmet says it is “the world’s first ‘light’ or reduced-calorie pasta with 40% fewer calories. It has been engineered to taste like “regular” pasta, but offer more nutritional value.

Barilla Plus is a multigrain pasta, endorsed as part of the Bob Greene Bestlife diet. It offers a good source of protein and ALA Omega-3.

ROUND 1: Nutrition Facts
Serving size, printed on the package, based on 2oz. of uncooked pasta.
Calories: FG = 130, BP = 210
Fat: FG = 1g, BP = 2g
Sodium: FG = 120mg, BP = 25mg
Total Carbs: FG = 42g, BP = 38g
Dietary Fiber: FG = 20g, BP = 4g
WW Points: FG = 2, BP = 4

Fiber Gourmet seems to lead the round, based on having significantly less calories, more fiber and less fat than its competitor. The near 100mg more of sodium found in FG is definitely cause for concern. Barilla Plus does have calcium and more iron, where the FG does not.

fiber gourmet pasta

ROUND 2: Taste and Ingredients
This is a tough round because each person’s personal preference will vary. I only eat whole grain pasta, and often the Barilla. I’ve grown accustomed to the taste. The Fiber Gourmet was definitely the right pasta for someone who enjoys that “traditional” starchy white pasta taste. It did seem a bit pasty to me, but firm and when blended with sauce was not too bad. The Barilla has a taste that does vary from the “traditional” pasta, but not so much that its a turn off. It’s not grainy and actually has a lot of flavor, it also cooks to a perfect al dente stage and tastes great no matter what it is in.

FG only comes in a fettucini-style noodle, but in flavors like whole wheat, classic, spinach and tomato. BP only comes in its regular multigrain pasta, but in six noodle styles.

As for ingredients, both have great lists that don’t call out any concerning items. Both have semolina, niacin, iron, riboflavin and folic acid. The FG has modified wheat starch and wheat gluten, while the BP has a grain and legume blend with lentils, chickpeas, egg whites, barley, flaxseed, oats and a few other items.

This round goes to Barilla Plus.

ROUND 3: Cost and Accessibility
Fiber Gourmet is available in 23 states in a variety of health food and chain grocery stores. Individual bags in store will vary, but cost about $3.00 for an 8oz. package. Their site lists each store in which you’ll find it. It’s also available for purchase online in bulk for prices ranging from $18.49 to $44.99.

Barilla Plus is sold in major and private grocery chains across the U.S. and the site lets you search availability by ZIP code. 14.5oz. packages sell for about $3.00 each. Online retailers like Amazon have it available in two-packs for $6.00.

This round goes to Barilla Plus.

barilla plus pasta

POST-MATCH COMMENTARY
There is no doubt that Fiber Gourmet is a quality product- especially for those looking for a traditional white pasta flavor, with healthier nutritional value. However, due to taste, its wholesome ingredients and greater accessibility, we deem Barilla Plus the winner of the Food Fight: Pasta.





graphic graphic element