Diets in Review - Find the Right Diet for You

Road Test: Running vs. Biking

running vs bikingRunning and biking are both great ways to work out and burn some calories, but which is best for you? Total calorie burn, joint health, and your willingness to invest in equipment are all factors to consider.

Benefits of Biking

Biking is a low-impact sport that won’t stress your knees, hips and ankles as much as running. It improves your endurance and balance, as you may remember from your first wobbly attempts to learn as a kid. A thirty minute bike ride at a pace of 10 mph will burn about 177 calories. Cycling works the lower body, plus the chest, back, triceps, and core.  If you have any joint or back problems, cycling is probably the best bet for you.

Benefits of Running

Thirty minutes of running at a pace of five miles per hour (12 minute miles) will burn 236 calories. However, it’s important to build up to this pace slowly if you’re new to running, otherwise you risk injury. Running works the leg muscles, including quads, gluts, calf muscles and hamstring. It also uses the biceps and abdominal muscles. You can run in many places a bike can’t navigate, and the only gear you really need is a good pair of running shoes. However, running does have high impact on your joints.

Conclusion

If you have no history of joint injuries, running will burn more fat and calories in a shorter amount of time. But don’t hesitate to cross train, strengthening different muscles is best for your overall health. Running and cycling are both great forms of exercise.

(via LiveStrong)

Also Read:

Running 101


Beginner’s Guide to Cycling

7 Mental Health Reasons to Run

August 15th, 2010

> Leave Feedback

User Feedback

(Page 0 of 1, 0 total comments)

There is no user feedback yet, leave yours below!


   
 

Leave Feedback

Skip the moderation queue by becoming a MyDIR member.

Already a member?

Need to sign up?
It’s free and only it takes a minute.
There are two ways to join:


Or, proceed without an account